Sayabouly - Hongsa
Approx 130 kms & what a brilliant motorcycle ride - a narrow, steep& winding roller coaster ride.
Stunning scenery & villages = take your time, I wanna go back for more.
The start near Sayabouly
View attachment 62205
into the mountains & onto the roller coaster
View attachment 62206
View attachment 62207
View attachment 62208
Scenery
View attachment 62209
a timeless life unchanged.
View attachment 62210
View attachment 62211
View attachment 62212
View attachment 62213
Entering a village
View attachment 62214
and what a village.......I parked the bike beside the road & walked back up the hill to use the zoom & pull the scene in.
After taking the photo I noticed the girls on the left, walking up the hill towards me - backwards!
Yep scared of the camera. I was astounded. They continued walking backwards right past me, then once past, sprinted off home.
Oops sorry ladies. A bit of a national geographic moment I thought - aint it good to be alive.
Back on the roller coaster road out of the village
View attachment 62215
Hongsa
View attachment 62216
and not such a pretty sight I thought. Oh well.....progress for some somewhere.
The new Hongsa power plant
View attachment 62217
to be coal - lignite powered.
A bit of a change since I was last here in 2007, somewhat beaten up. There was most definitely no power plant. How fast things are changing.
View attachment 62218
Its an absolutely massive power plant
View attachment 62219
to supply power to Thailand, sourced from the cheap Hongsa lignite.
Not everyone is happy about the development & some of the history is interesting.
Bangkok Post, 24/09/2012
Banpu Plc, one of the region’s largest coal producers, could face even greater legal troubles as lawyers for Siva Nganthavee have vowed to appeal against last week’s Civil Court victory to seek even higher compensation.
The Civil Court on Thursday ordered Banpu to pay over 31 billion baht in damages to Mr Siva for what was characterised as “deception” on the part of the listed company over a partnership to develop a coal mining and power project in Hongsa, Laos.
Theerapun Petchsuwan, a lawyer representing Mr Siva, said his client will file an appeal despite his victory, pressing for higher compensation.
Mr Siva had originally sought damages of 63.5 billion baht from Banpu.
Mr Theerapun told the Bangkok Post that Banpu could land in more trouble due to a separate suit between Mr Siva and the Lao government.
Mr Siva is seeking payment of US$71 million (2.19 billion baht) from Laos for breaking the original contract held by his company, Thai-Lao Lignite, for the Hongsa power project.
Mr Theerapun claimed to have documents that state Banpu had agreed to compensate the Lao government for any legal costs related to the Thai-Lao Lignite lawsuit.
Thai-Lao Lignite won a concession from the Lao government in 1994 to develop a coal-fired power plant for electricity sales to Thailand.
In 2004, Banpu entered into a joint venture with Thai-Lao Lignite Co for the project.
But the Lao government in 2006 scrapped the project, citing a lack of development. Later, Thai energy authorities revised upwards its power demand plans, leading Laos to reopen bids for the Hongsa concession, which was won by Banpu in 2006.
In the Thai Civil Court case, Mr Siva accused Banpu of using information gained from their joint venture and “misinforming” the Lao government to cancel Thai-Lao Lignite’s original concession. The Civil Court awarded Mr Siva damages of 4 billion baht and additional compensation for opportunity losses of 860 million baht a year from 2015-27 and 1.38 billion baht a year from 2028-39.
Mr Theerapun said Mr Siva had sued three companies connected to the case: Banpu Plc, Banpu Power and Banpu International. The damage claim was 4 billion baht for the feasibility study, and 59.5 billion baht for revenue losses due to the cancellation of the Thai-Lao Lignite concession.
Mr Theerapun said under the original contract, Thai-Lao would be paid for coal used to generate electricity from the Hongsa project, equal to another $577.5 million based on demand estimates of 350 million tonnes over the lifetime of the concession at a cost of $1.65 a tonne.
“[Mr Siva] is likely to appeal to cover this loss as well as for other opportunity losses. We will know the exact amount once the full [court] ruling is completed. After that, we will submit a petition, which may be in November or December,” Mr Theerapun said.
He said Thai-Lao Lignite would also appeal the court’s decision to dismiss lawsuits filed against three directors of Banpu: president and chief executive Chanin Vongkusolkit, Ongart Auapinyakul and Chanchai Jivacate.
Mr Theerapun said Mr Siva has debts of more than 10 billion baht borrowed for the Hongsa project and was now essentially bankrupt due to the cancellation of the concession.
“According to the feasibility study, the Hongsa power plant will generate profits of around 100 billion baht over the term of the project. It’s only fair that compensation is paid to Thai-Lao Lignite, the former owner of the project,” Mr Theerapun said.
The case between Thai-Lao Lignite and the Lao government has been in arbitration since 2007.
James Berger, a lawyer with Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, a law firm representing Mr Siva in the case, said the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law had ruled that Laos had to pay $57.2 million to Thai-Lao Lignite for breach of contract.
The Lao government has refused to pay the award, leading Thai-Lao Lignite to file for enforcement of the award in courts in London, Paris and New York.
Mr Berger said in an email interview that a French court confirmed the arbitration ruling in 2010, while a US court affirmed the ruling on appeal earlier this year. With interest, the total award is now worth over $71 million.
Both Mr Berger and Mr Theerapun confirmed that Banpu ultimately could be held responsible for the ruling.
Executives of Banpu could not be reached for comment. The company is expected to make an announcement on the case today.
In a statement to the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) last week, Banpu chief financial officer Somruedee Chaimongkol denied any wrongdoing and said the company would appeal against the verdict.
In an interview with the Bangkok Post last month, Mr Chanin insisted the Hongsa project would not be affected by the litigation. He said that Thai-Lao Lignite had invited Banpu to participate in the project.
Mr Chanin denied any role that may have led the Lao government to terminate the Thai-Lao Lignite concession, and insisted that Banpu had won the new bid fairly.
Shares of Banpu fell 38 baht or 8.6% to 404 baht in trade on the SET on Friday.
Analysts said the judgement could wipe out more than two years of the company’s profits, as a legal reserve against the award is set up pending a court appeal.
BAN PU UNPHAZED BY TTL LAWSUIT
Nalin Viboonchart
The Nation February 28, 2011 12:00 am
Banpu is confident that a lawsuit claiming damages of Bt63.5 billion, filed against it by Thai-Lao Lignite (TLL), will not affect development of the 1,878-megawatt (MW) Hongsa power plant project in Laos.
Banpu recently secured a loan worth US$2.78 billion (approximately Bt94.62 billion) to finance the project. Banpu CEO Chanin Vongkusolkit said that since Hongsa was developed by Hongsa Power Co (HPC), not Banpu, TLL's lawsuit would not disrupt development. Banpu holds a 40-per-cent stake in HPC, with Ratchaburi Electricity Generating Holding holding 40 per cent and Lao Holding State Enterprise with the remaining 20 per cent.
TLL, the Lao government's former concessionaire for the Hongsa power project, filed a lawsuit against Banpu in 2007.
It alleged that Banpu and its subsidiaries deceived TLL into entering into an agreement in order to gain access to information about coalmine concesssions and feasibility study reports on the lignite-fired power-plant project. As a result, TLL misinformed the Lao government, leading to the concession termination.
The government later awarded the concession to the Banpu consortium. Chanin said Banpu estimated it would take more than two years to complete the hearings, since TLL's CEO Siva Nganthavee had been subject to a receivership order by the Central Bankruptcy Court and the official receiver would take his place in pursuing the civil case.
Chanin also denied TLL's allegations, saying TLL invited Banpu to invest in the Hongsa power project in late 2004. However, there were certain disagreements during the development of the project and the agreement was terminated by TLL in July 2006.
In 2006, the Lao government was worried about delays to the Hongsa project. It terminated the mining concession and power project agreement with TLL and called for a new bid process. Three Thai companies including Banpu joined the bidding. About three months later, Banpu was awarded the right to conduct a feasibility study on developing the Hongsa project. "Banpu puts much emphasis on good corporate governance, having adhered to integrity, transparency and fairness," Chanin said.
According to Noppol Milinthanggoon, managing director of Ratchaburi Electricity Generating Holding, the Hongsa power project is about 30 per cent complete. HPC last year secured a syndicated loan from nine banks, including Bangkok Bank, Siam Commercial Bank, Kasikorn Bank, and the Government Savings Bank, to finance the project. The power plant is set to be commissioned in 2015.
Despite Banpu's confidence, James Berger, a lawyer from Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, which is responsible for TLL's litigation, is bullish on the lawsuit. TLL also commenced arbitration against the Lao government in 2007.
In November 2009, UNCITRAL, the core UN legal body for international trade law, ruled that the Lao government improperly breached the agreement with TLL and ordered Laos to pay US$57.2 million (Bt1.75 billion) to the company. The government is still refusing to pay the award, leading the law firm to commence enforcement proceedings under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). It subsequently filed similar actions in London, Paris and New York.
The French courts in July 2010 confirmed the ruling. The judgement from the New York Convention is expected to be made this month, said Berger. Berger said Banpu agreed to pay the Lao government's legal expenses in connection with any claims brought by TLL as a result of Laos' termination of its concession. This, he said, provided convincing evidence that Banpu benefited from the termination. He said there was also a memorandum to the prime minister of Laos in which the chairman of the Committee for Planning and Investment stated that selecting a new investor by way of an auction was not desirable because the government would have to spend a long time preparing documents. And Banpu had all the information needed to decide to develop the project. When TLL terminated the agreement with Banpu, it requested that Banpu return all information concerning the Hongsa project, but Banpu refused to do so, he said. "Laos is heavily dependent on foreign investment for its infrastructure development.
The refusal to honour the arbitration award is really a fundamental breach of trust that may become an obstacle to Laos' ability to lure foreign investors," he said. A Thai lawyer from TLL said the company was more confident about the suit against Banpu after the arbitration ruling.
TLL insisted construction in 2006 was on track and there was no reason for the termination. Regarding the civil lawsuit against Banpu, TLL claimed damages of Bt63.5 billion. Including interest of 7.5 per cent per year, the amount now totals Bt80 billion. Echoing Chanin, the lawyer said he expected the case between TLL and Banpu to be concluded in 2012 or 2013.