:lol-sign: well said! Good luck indeed! :take-that:mezcal wrote: "Russian Roulette" are the words that come to my mind.
good luck
:lol-sign: well said! Good luck indeed! :take-that:TonyBKK wrote: [quote quote=mezcal]"Russian Roulette" are the words that come to my mind.
good luck
hEhE Thanks for the info....... you have same username at thaivisa right ? . ,thaicbr wrote: Omega... The CB400 would be easier to find spares for. But to be honest i like the Inazuma better for looks etc. Like any bike check it over and make the decision based on that. 2002 is not so old as long as it's not been Thaied. If original then go for it. One thing to remember a lot of these bikes were training bikes in Japan so they may be restricted. Its not a hard fix jets etc. but be aware. I rode a Bandit that frankly would not pull the skin of a rice pudding, it was lethargic.
Allan
I think that most would agree that 140+ is OK for Thailand most of the time. But larger capacity, bigger HP bikes are not just about speed, its acceleration, more powerful brakes and riding comfort as well. However I would think that to expect to travel at 140+ km/h on a 250 is way off realistic, even with derestricting etc. Maybe can reach near 140 downhill with wind behind, but to travel at that speed???? Now the ER6N will do that if you do not mind the wind, and the 650 Ninja, comfortable cruising range for it.KZ wrote:
If a 650 Ninja is too big, why not a 250 for 150,000 baht? Brand new, warranty, cheap parts and dealers to fix it. Also gets a decent resale price.
140+ km/h should do in Thailand! (Some people may not agree.)
I have cruised at 140 (indicated) two up on an NSR150 :shock:johngooding wrote: [quote quote=KZ]
I However I would think that to expect to travel at 140+ km/h on a 250 is way off realistic, even with derestricting etc.
KZ wrote: You got your quotes mixed up there, rusty Mike!
I went an indicated 140 on a CBR150R, on a straight. People may be surprised what these little bikes are capable of - with light weight and superior maneuverability compared to bigger and heavier bikes, they can give them a run for their money, especially in the twisty areas or in tight traffic. A Ninja 250 may outrun a sport tourer with three times the power, and the mentioned CB1300.
But the question was: Any good touring bike? and of course I have to agree with John that bigger bikes have better acceleration and offer more comfort, and have to have better brakes (to stop all that weight) so why not recommend the Gold Wing 1600? Because this is TH and a smaller bike makes more sense, and avaiability plays an important role. Rather than waste days traveling from place to place to meet owners of used bikes or spending your time in BKK traffic, making it all over town to bike shops to check out "painted ponies" with no warranty I'd go stright to the Kawa dealer and get a new, reliable bike for a good price I can ride without trouble from day 1. Most used bikes you have to sort out first. Or look for a used Er6.
If you really want a four-in-line, go for a CB400, many local mechanics know how to fix them and parts are more easily to get. A decent 400Four with green book goes for 150,000+ and should work fine.
Welcome to GT Rider. 9 posts and you're already slagging off on the ER6... :think:oMega wrote: Well a A decent ., CB400 Version.S with Book. , it around., 80k. ,
150k., Well then u got a Spec 3. , Vtech.,
ERn.6......... Sounds so shitty with 2 cylinder. . , need 4 for a real Sound. , . !
Ah I do that sometimes in an effort to reduce the verbiage I cut out the wrong bits.KZ wrote: You got your quotes mixed up there, rusty Mike!
Welcome to GT Rider. 9 posts and you're already slagging off on the ER6... :think:TonyBKK wrote: [quote quote=oMega]Well a A decent ., CB400 Version.S with Book. , it around., 80k. ,
150k., Well then u got a Spec 3. , Vtech.,
ERn.6......... Sounds so shitty with 2 cylinder. . , need 4 for a real Sound. , . !